<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bailout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spinachflame.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/bailout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spinachflame.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/bailout/</link>
	<description>Tons of Toons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: spinachflame</title>
		<link>http://spinachflame.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/bailout/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>spinachflame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinachflame.wordpress.com/?p=602#comment-280</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a tough call.  I don&#039;t like the pork in the stimulus.  But I think we have to get people to work.  I&#039;m just worried that people will get their stimulus check, if they end up sending out checks, and put it right into the bank, thus not allowing the money to circulate.  Maybe the gov&#039;t should send folks multiple small stimulus checks so that they&#039;ll feel more compelled to spend the $?  Again, it&#039;s a tough call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a tough call.  I don&#8217;t like the pork in the stimulus.  But I think we have to get people to work.  I&#8217;m just worried that people will get their stimulus check, if they end up sending out checks, and put it right into the bank, thus not allowing the money to circulate.  Maybe the gov&#8217;t should send folks multiple small stimulus checks so that they&#8217;ll feel more compelled to spend the $?  Again, it&#8217;s a tough call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ram Venkatararam</title>
		<link>http://spinachflame.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/bailout/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Ram Venkatararam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinachflame.wordpress.com/?p=602#comment-279</guid>
		<description>Human? I didn&#039;t read that in his campaign literature. And I looked...hard!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Human? I didn&#8217;t read that in his campaign literature. And I looked&#8230;hard!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1984winstonsmith</title>
		<link>http://spinachflame.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/bailout/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>1984winstonsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinachflame.wordpress.com/?p=602#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Can you say &quot;unlimited Liberal free-spending&quot;??  What this has all been about is power with no checks and balances.  If the plan is going to pass, as written (irresponsibly large...remember &quot;mortgaging our childrens&#039; futures&quot;?), let it by along partisan lines. Then the Dems can take credit, or take to the hills, all on their own!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you say &#8220;unlimited Liberal free-spending&#8221;??  What this has all been about is power with no checks and balances.  If the plan is going to pass, as written (irresponsibly large&#8230;remember &#8220;mortgaging our childrens&#8217; futures&#8221;?), let it by along partisan lines. Then the Dems can take credit, or take to the hills, all on their own!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
